This movie requires Flash Player 8. Download Flash Player 8

Bible Search Tools
Search verses, topics, or keywords.
Search By:
Use these Filters to narrow your search results
Alleged Discrepancies

Canaanites Were in the Land…Then

by Eric Lyons, M.Min.

Have you ever wondered why, if Moses wrote the Pentateuch, in Genesis 12:6 and 13:7 the Bible says (in reference to the time of Abraham), “[T]he Canaanites were then in the land” (emp. added). If the Canaanites occupied the land of Canaan in Moses’ day, why would Moses write that they were in the land then (in the days of Abraham)? Would these verses not make more sense if we understood them as being written at a time when the Canaanites had been driven out of the land of Canaan (which was hundreds of years after the death of Moses)? According to several critics, this is exactly what the verses are implying (cf. Gottwald, 1959, p. 104; McKinsey, 1995, pp. 361-362). Supposedly, Moses could not have been the author of the passage; else it would not have made sense to its original audience.

The phrase “the Canaanites were then in the land” does not necessarily have to point to a time after Moses when the Canaanites no longer were in Canaan. When the careful student takes into consideration the context of these passages, and the momentous events of Abraham leaving his homeland and coming to the new region that his descendents one day would occupy, he or she easily can understand that the phrase in question refers to this land promise (12:7). The words “then in the land” merely are indicating “that the land into which Abram had come was not uninhabited and without a possessor; so that Abram could not regard it at once as his own and proceed to take possession of it, but could only wander in it in faith as in a foreign land (Heb. 11:9)” [Keil and Delitzsch, 1996]. Likely, the Canaanites are mentioned as being in the land at the time of Abraham’s entrance in order “to show the strength of his faith in the promise recorded” (Jamieson, et al., 1997). Such phraseology involves neither a contradiction nor an absurdity.


Jamieson, Robert, et al. (1997), Jamieson, Fausset, Brown Bible Commentary (Electronic Database: Biblesoft).

Keil, C.F. and F. Delitzsch (1996), Keil and Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament (Electronic Database: Biblesoft), new updated edition.

Copyright © 2004 Apologetics Press, Inc. All rights reserved.

We are happy to grant permission for items in the “Alleged Discrepancies” section to be reproduced in part or in their entirety, as long as the following stipulations are observed: (1) Apologetics Press must be designated as the original publisher; (2) the specific Apologetics Press Web site URL must be noted; (3) the author’s name must remain attached to the materials; (4) textual alterations of any kind are strictly forbidden; (5) Some illustrations (e.g., photographs, charts, graphics, etc.) are not the intellectual property of Apologetics Press and as such cannot be reproduced from our site without consent from the person or organization that maintains those intellectual rights; (6) serialization of written material (e.g., running an article in several parts) is permitted, as long as the whole of the material is made available, without editing, in a reasonable length of time; (7) articles, excepting brief quotations, may not be offered for sale or included in items offered for sale; and (8) articles may be reproduced in electronic form for posting on Web sites pending they are not edited or altered from their original content and that credit is given to Apologetics Press, including the web location from which the articles were taken.

For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:

Apologetics Press
230 Landmark Drive
Montgomery, Alabama 36117
Phone (334) 272-8558